Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.

Author Guidelines

Author Guidelines


All submitted papers are subject to strict blind peer review process by at least three national and international reviewers;

The rejected articles are not being resent for reviewing;

The papers before being sent for reviewing are first checked by anti-plagiarism software. Authors should provide all sources of data used in the research. Plagiarism in all its forms is unethical and it is unacceptable.

Authors' responsibilities

Authors must ensure that the submitted article is their original work, which has not been previously published;

Authors must ensure that the submitted article has not been considered for publication elsewhere;

Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic;

Authors must report any errors in their published paper to the Editors;

Authors should provide revised version of their article, according to the reviewers' recommendations.

Reviewers' responsibilities

Any manuscript received for reviewing will be treated as confidential document;

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors;

Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper;

Reviewers should inform the editors on any substantial similarity between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper;

Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Editors' responsibilities

Editors decide which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published;

Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication;

Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit;

Peer review assists the editors in making editorial decisions. Editors should publish only peer reviewed accepted articles;

Editors should have a clear picture of a research's funding sources;

An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.